Six agents — Tender Intelligence, Evidence Intelligence, Evaluator Lab, Red Team, Improvement, Compliance — read your tender, check your evidence, score your draft, and attack every weak claim. Automatically, the moment you finish drafting. No guaranteed wins — we guarantee process quality.
No typing, no upload. Just watch — this is the exact gap an evaluator flags first.
We take safeguarding very seriously, and have policies in place to protect service users. Our staff are trained and follow best practice guidelines.
Illustrative example — not a real client submission.
"To be confirmed" doesn't ship. Not a target we aim for — a hard gate every submission passes through, with nothing left blank.
Word limits, accreditations, insurance levels, attachment naming — all checked before a client ever lays eyes on a draft.
Your first draft lands with real time to actually review it — not the night before the portal closes.
Every screen below is a real screenshot — no stock UI, no placeholders.
Every bid opens on a Stage 0 Pre-Analysis Compliance Gate — the contracting authority, deadline, pass/fail criteria, and scoring structure all confirmed before a single word is written. 11 checks, all required, before the bid can even advance to Stage 1.
Bring your own answers, or use AI assist to get a first pass down. Either way, every section is checked directly against the evaluation criteria the ITT actually asks for — CDM 2015 compliance, programme certainty, local supply chain — not a generic capability statement.
Every mandatory requirement — word counts, accreditations, insurance levels, attachment naming, zero TBCs — checked before the client ever sees a draft. One manual checkpoint you or the client confirm before it moves on. If anything fails, it goes back to Drafting.
The finished draft gets scored the way a real procurement panel would — red/amber/green, with the exact weaknesses an evaluator would flag first. This one came back "strong pass, likely top quartile" with three specific, fixable notes.
The finished document downloads as a real Word file. Once there's an outcome, the debrief — what worked, what didn't, lessons for next time — feeds straight back into the next bid, not lost in someone's inbox.
The full Stage 0–6 gated workflow — a pre-analysis compliance gate, AI-assisted drafting, a non-negotiable compliance check, an evaluator-style review, and a real Word document ready to submit.
See it in the product →Every live opportunity in one ranked table — contract value, win probability, expected value, and a clear bid/no-bid recommendation, before anyone drafts a word.
See it in the product →Live UK Contracts Finder notices for your target authorities, plus a growing playbook of what actually predicts a win with each one — built from real debriefs, never a client's raw data.
See it in the product →Run any drafted section through the same red/amber/green lens a real procurement evaluator uses, then apply a rewritten "balanced final version" grounded only in facts already in your draft.
See it in the product →The moment Evaluator Lab finishes, Red Team runs on its own — attacking every unsupported claim, generic phrase, and evidence gap the same way a hostile assessor would, quoted and explained.
See it in the product →Win/loss charts, predicted-vs-actual score per bid, and a section-by-section breakdown of exactly where marks were won or lost.
See it in the product →Every debrief — what worked, what didn't, the lessons — lives in one place and feeds straight back into your next bid's draft.
See it in the product →Connect once, pick your accreditations, policies, and case studies from Drive, and every future bid gets checked against your real company evidence automatically.
See it in the product →
Built around programme certainty, compliance, and supply chain evidence — the exact language a construction evaluator is scoring against.
Not a slogan — the actual mechanism behind three parts of the product, and it's honest about what it does and doesn't share.
When a bid closes — won or lost — the debrief is generalized into one buyer-behaviour insight and added to that authority's Playbook. Nothing client-identifying is ever shared across accounts.
Every drafted section is checked the way a real procurement panel marks a submission — red/amber/green, with the exact gaps an evaluator would flag first.
Mastermind pulls context from your own past won bids in the same sector straight into the next draft — not a report someone has to remember to read.
A real finished bid — built from all three mechanisms on the left.
Consultit.ai is an AI-augmented bid writing agency for UK construction SMEs competing for public and private sector construction contracts. We're based in London, and every submission runs through a 7-stage process with a non-negotiable compliance gate before it ever reaches a client.
Founder, CEO & CTO
Co-founder & COO
1 in 5 UK construction firms have lost a tender over exactly this. No email, no login — answer from memory, "I'd need to check" counts as a real answer.
Seven questions, grounded in the real UK construction PQQ standard (CAS / PAS 91) and the actual legal minimum for Employers' Liability cover. Nothing is verified against your documents — this is an honest self-check, not a certificate audit.
Every bid is priced on its own complexity, timeline, and difficulty — plus a founding-client rate reserved for our first five clients.
Both. The platform is real bid management software — score opportunities, draft against evaluation criteria, run a compliance gate, and track win/loss outcomes across every bid. You can run it yourself, or have us run it for you as a full-service bid writing engagement. Most clients start with the service and move to self-serve once they've seen how it works.
No — nobody honestly can. We guarantee a real process: proper scoring, compliance checked, nothing submitted with a TBC in it.
Suppliers only — the construction firms bidding for contracts, not the councils, housing associations, or main contractors buying them.
Depends on the tender's complexity and your deadline. Under 3 weeks' notice from enquiry to portal close counts as rush and is priced accordingly — we still run every stage, including the compliance gate.
We're onboarding five founding clients to build and pressure-test the platform with real tenders — locked in for life at £1,500/bid or £6,000/quarter (up to 6 bids/quarter, capacity permitting — or 5 seats on the platform instead if you'd rather write them yourselves), plus direct input into how it evolves.
We're building this with our first founding clients right now — real feedback, real tenders, no case studies invented to look further along than we are. If you're one of the first five, you shape what this becomes.
Our in-house platform drafts a sample response straight from your Invitation to Tender — no company data needed to see how it thinks.
